Home > Finance > WST: Corporate Valuation – TEV & Minority Interest

WST: Corporate Valuation – TEV & Minority Interest

February 5th, 2010


Learn how corporations are valued and the major analytical tools that are used. Go beyond academic theory to real-world methods as used by professionals; includes a crucial primer to Corporate Finance and its non-theoretical application. Apply learning objectives and goals immediately by analyzing a $6 billion+ transaction. Topics covered include: (i) how to value a company (trading comps, deal comps, DCF, LBO, break-up and asset valuation); (ii) importance of Enterprise Value, EBITDA, capital structure, leverage and WACC; (iii) analyze valuation multiples and ratios; why are PE ratios sub-optimal as a valuation metric?; (iv) practical, non-theoretical application of introduction to corporate finance. ***YOUTUBE VISITORS ONLY*** 10% off any online course, use Discount code: youtube www.wstselfstudy.com

Finance , , ,

  1. TheSyukri
    February 5th, 2010 at 14:34 | #1

    good presentation but and really to get something from this material

  2. caijin412
    February 5th, 2010 at 14:51 | #2

    nice. he speaks super fastttttt though

  3. 54spiritedwill54
    February 5th, 2010 at 15:49 | #3

    Good stuff, please post more!

  4. drunicusrex
    February 5th, 2010 at 16:16 | #4

    Assets equal liabilities plus equity – that pretty much sums it up as far as cap structure goes.
    It worries me a bit that this training is aimed at recent Ivy League undergrads – shouldn’t we know all this already? It’s Financial Accounting 101.

  5. prashprabhu
    February 5th, 2010 at 17:02 | #5

    Superb funda man. Till now nobody were knowing how significant that minority interest affects. Now its much cleeeeeeeeeear

  6. MikeT2005
    February 5th, 2010 at 17:06 | #6

    But you’re buying cash for cash. It doesn’t make any real difference. You can either pay dollar-for-dollar for the cash component, or let them take their cash out of the company before selling the equity. The outcome is the same. And it also makes sense because the earnings from the cash proportion of the company can only really be valued at the risk free rate.

  7. mamaier30
    February 5th, 2010 at 17:16 | #7

    good stuff…

  8. johntsebastian
    February 5th, 2010 at 18:02 | #8

    He’s legit….unfortunately he doesn’t have much style but he does have substance

  9. stighelmer
    February 5th, 2010 at 18:44 | #9

    you are the man.

  10. dadada75
    February 5th, 2010 at 19:26 | #10

    who the hell is this guy?im not saying he’s bad..he’s good, make no mistake..but is he an as.prof at wharton or something?an inv banker?

    btw…dont u need to deduct “cash” from ur TEV?my firm found it hard to justify the use of TEV as a form of valuation.this would mean that you will pay a low figure for a cash rich company with low debt…

  11. EurodanceLove
    February 5th, 2010 at 19:39 | #11

    Wow!….I actually learn something here!

    Good stuff, please post more! CAPM, Valuation, WACC, etc…

    Fin student in need of schooling here!

  12. MikeT2005
    February 5th, 2010 at 20:05 | #12

    Ha ha ha! “Finance is not like a science. We just like to pretend it is to justify our high pay.”

    Classic. Shhhhhhhh! Don’t tell them that!

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers